Talk:Spiceworld (album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Spicegirls-spiceworld.jpg

Image:Spicegirls-spiceworld.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Lack of information

This is article has hardly any information , it is one of the best selling albums of all time and hardly anything is said about it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.10.141.122 (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Nathan Johnson (talk) 17:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

---

• Spiceworld (album) → Spiceworld
• Spiceworld → Spiceworld (disambiguation)

– Pretty much unquestionably the primary topic. Unreal7 (talk) 09:37, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

• Oppose really sorry but Spice World (film) seems equally mentioned in Google Books. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose per In ictu oculi. The film is often referred to as "Spiceworld". Peter James (talk) 22:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support. So use a hatnote. Powers ^T 02:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
• 'Support. I agree with what User:Powers said. -SuperHotWiki (talk) 03:32, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose "Spiceworld" should redirect to the film -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose - Neither is primary. Why would a notable album be more recognized and primary than a notable film? Or the other way around? The album is less viewed than the film, but... well, back then, the album was more well-received than the film. Also, do not redirect "spiceworld" to either film or article; the title should stay as of the dab page. --George Ho (talk) 06:51, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

  It doesn't matter which is more recognized; the two titles are sufficiently different that a hatnote is sufficient for disambiguation. Powers ^T 17:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

  Here we go again; if moved, hatnotes can change or be removed, and dab pages can change. --George Ho (talk) 19:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

  I refuse to believe that the Spice World film is more recognizable. The album was more successful than the film and the album came out first.--SuperHotWiki (talk) 23:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Studio and Soundtrack album

This album (just like 'Glitter' by Mariah Carey) should be listed as a studio album and a soundtrack. I know the body of the article mentions it, but so should the lead and the infobox (as before). The Spice Girls themselves have described it as a soundtrack album. Israell (talk) 18:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Spiceworld (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/pop-albums-the-spice-girls-spiceworld-virgin-cdv-2850-1292532.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://ifpi.org.tw/chart/1997/intl47.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141216134527/http://top20.dk/chart/1997 to http://top20.dk/chart/1997
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141216152141/http://top20.dk/chart/1998 to http://top20.dk/chart/1998
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928160008/http://www.riaj.or.jp/issue/record/1999/199903.pdf to http://www.riaj.or.jp/issue/record/1999/199903.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)