Talk:Financial endowment
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Move to Wiktionary
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Sargdub (talk) 03:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
from VfD: No more than a dictionary definition—Trevor Caira 14:53, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- If suitable, move to Wiktionary. --Wikimol 16:54, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. There is a certainly an encyclopedia article to be written here about the role that endowments play in our public institutions and financial markets. Tomato 23:30, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Agree with Tomato. --Key45 00:37, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, too. Samaritan 02:46, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Copyvio as it stands (lifted right from its source)—Trevor Caira 03:00, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, moving to wiktionary if they want it. Yes, there's an article to be written about them. This is not a useful beginning to one however, and should someone need this they can find it on wiktionary or in a random dictionary. --fvw* 03:20, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)
- Keep. Can be expanded. -[[User:Ld|Ld | talk]] 05:36, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep stub as prod to writing a real article. Claim of possible copyvio seems silly: it's almost impossible to have a single-sentence definition not fall under fair use. -- Jmabel | Talk 09:27, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)
- Obvious keep. Dan100 09:49, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Still a stub?
[edit]Is this article still considered a stub? Is the VfD discussion still needed in the talk pages? --Techieman 04:48, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Endowed Professorships references
[edit]I added material that I would like to footnote, but since this is my first ever entry, I am not understanding how to do it. The reference to Lady Margaret is referenced here: http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/news/dp/2004110501 The reference to the Lucasian Chair is referenced here: http://lucasianchair.org/lucasianchair.org/brief.html There is information about the first endowed chair in America (Harvard) that I did not include but may be appropriate here: http://www.hds.harvard.edu/history.html
I am hoping that others will contribute additional information on Endowed Chairs if they have it.
One final question, can a link be created so if someone types in the search box "endowed chairs" or "endowed professorships" it takes them right to this space?
Thanks --Gusnite 19:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Gusnite
- Nice finds on the information for the first endowments! I have added the references to the article. This is where you learn how to add footnotes. Endowed chair now redirects to Financial endowment. Techieman 06:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- In References, the link to "So Nicely Endowed" needs to be updated to http://www.newsweek.com/id/54660 instead of http://www.newsweek.com/id/39272. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.215.94.172 (talk) 02:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
How does it appear in Financial Statements?
[edit]How is endowment described in financial statements?Tom Cod (talk) 21:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
College and university endowments in the United States
[edit]The Financial endowment article and College and university endowments in the United States article are almost identical. Is there a need for both? Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Very Stubby
[edit]More needs to be said about how a financial endowment works on interest earnings rather than consuming the principal. Gautam Discuss 17:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Legal structure
[edit]Note: Need section about legal structure. (Article is not clear. Is an endowment its own entity type under the law or it is simply a Trust that is designated to endow?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72Dino (talk • contribs) 17:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Contradiction
[edit]The Quasi-endowments section contradicts itself as to whether one can be restricted. --Stfg (talk) 09:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Needs clarification
[edit]The article doesn't really say whether endowment is the TOTAL amount accumulated by and available to an institution or the size of donations they get every year. I believe it's the most important aspect of this article. My assumption is that it's the cumulative amount - it's difficult to imagine Harvard University gets 30 billion dollars every year. Is that correct? Could someone please clarify this?
I also believe the definition in the first sentence is wrong. A financial endowment is a NOT transfer of money and/or property donated to an institution. It is that money and/or property already donated and in possession of the institution. BadaBoom (talk) 00:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)