Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-01-17/Features
Hello,
It's Kardashev scale, not Kardashev Scale. I twould also be good to have a link to FAC in the article. Otherwise, looks good. —Ben Brockert (42) UE News 22:32, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Or Everyking will go in there and edit it himself, despite the fact that it's in your user space. —Ben Brockert (42) UE News 00:11, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
It's a decent start, even if you're not satisfied with it yet. At any rate, the effort to give the article some kind of theme is a good idea, whether or not this theme is the right one. Putting a theme together when dealing with disparate subjects can be a challenging art. There's still time left in the coming week to see what happens; events may make you reconsider what to write about.
Additional thoughts about covering FACs generally, not directed to any topic in particular. Articles that undergo significant change after nomination, or overcome major objections, will probably be of more interest than those that are slam dunks one way or the other. Also, if an article has been a Collaboration of the week before, that's an extra source to look for something interesting to say about it and its development. --Michael Snow 04:03, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-01-17/Features page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-01-17/Features" page.
