Jump to content

User talk:Crobzub

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop adding the city names to the infoboxes in airline articles. We decided against that in the airline Wikiproject. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Airlines for more information. Thanks. Dbinder 21:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, please make sure that the casual reader can easily work out where the hubs actually are, so they don't think "Where the hell is that?" because it's annoying having to click on the link to find out where the airport is. Crobzub 21:18, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Universities in the United Kingdom, by RFBailey, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Universities in the United Kingdom fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

CSD G6: making room for move of British universities


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Universities in the United Kingdom, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Universities in the United Kingdom itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Beat Freaks

[edit]

Please do not move pages to nonsensical titles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to learn more about moving pages, please see the guidelines on this subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~ Homologeo (talk) 23:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beat Freaks

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Beat Freaks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The page used to be a redirect, but is no longer. Could someone please delete this?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~ Homologeo (talk) 23:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Future Armour listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Future Armour. Since you had some involvement with the Future Armour redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 12:56, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Pissing it down" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pissing it down. Since you had some involvement with the Pissing it down redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]