Talk:Baker 13
from VfD:
"Over 100 students" with nothing else to do but smear shaving cream on windows and doors with their bodies. The information probably belongs in the Rice entry. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 21:02, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Agreed. Merge. --L33tminion | (talk) 21:22, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Merge Wyss 22:57, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge --fvw* 23:38, 2004 Dec 17 (UTC)
- Delete: Not worth merging -- Ricecruft. Geogre 02:38, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge—Trevor Caira 03:14, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Weak merge, although I can absolutely see a point in not associating this with the Rice article (and thus deleting it). Think about it: if you're considering sending your kid to Rice, and you come here to look up information, and this is what you see, what impression will you be left with? --PacknCanes 06:06, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I can see your point. But should we be sweeping embarrassing facts under the carpet? I think the question is whether this little ritual is significant enough to mention at all on Wikipedia. If it is (which I doubt) it should at least be mentioned in the main Rice article, with a separate article on its own if it is significant enough. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 06:42, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- No, we shouldn't be in the business of doing away with embarrassing facts, and I realized after I commented that I probably opened up a whole new can of worms. What worries me about merging this is that it has absolutely no academic or social connection to the University; it's purely coincidental that it happens at Rice rather than, say, at U. of Houston. Like I said above, I can go either way. If the consensus says merge, which it looks like it will, then that's cool. --PacknCanes 19:21, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
Start a discussion about improving the Baker 13 page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Baker 13" page.
