User talk:Tearsinrain

Welcome!

Hello, Tearsinrain, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my New-Users' Talk Page.

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language

Happy editing!

Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:40, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Johnnie Walker Blue

Hi. I noticed your addition to the Johnnie Walker page. You stated that Blue Label is rumored to be about 50 years old. Now with blends isn't the age stated the age of the youngest malt and grain? It seems it would be nearly impossible for them to blend together numerous whiskies which were all 50 years or older. More likely, it seems to me, the oldest whisky in the blend is about that age. Certainly if they could attach a 50 year old classification to it, they'd make a pretty big deal over it. -R. fiend 03:41, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You did fine in your reply. No faux as or anything; that's just how it's done. Anyway, that's quite interesting, but I am slightly skeptical. Even 30 year old scotches are very rare, and since some is lost each year it is aged, we'd be seeing some very low casks after 60 or so. Is there any chane the guy said that the youngest malt whisky was pre-WWII? It's my understanding that when they put an age on a blend, even the grain whiskies have to be at least as old as the year listed. Unless Blue Label is a vatted malt (and I don't think it is), it will have a substantial amount of grain whisky in it. Now I'm far from an expert on the subject (I don't drink blends if I don't have to, though I can't always afford single malts), but I'd be surprised if anyone even ages grain whiskies that much. I doubt there's much call for 50 year old grain whisky, and blenders probably don't want to pay top dollar for such a grain, not when the point is that they're cheaper. This at least would explain why they don't advertize the age (I'm not buying the "modesty" thing; they don't seem to shy from superlatives in the booklet). Hell, if I were selling a scotch that old I'd write "50 FREAKIN' YEARS OLD! YEAH!" across the label. But I honestly don't know; I'm just conjecturing.

On another note, I think including the contents of the entire booklet is excessive, and may even have copyright issues (I'm not sure). How would you feel about selectively quoting the more important parts, perhaps with a bit of summary? I think it would help the article. -R. fiend 15:12, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox MotoGP rider

Template:Infobox MotoGP rider has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]