Talk:Just William

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I'd just like to say that the full stop on the end of Home and Happy Mag. should be there and that in the quoted passage the second "em" does not have a leading apostrophe in the original text, although it perhaps should. - Cgs — Preceding undated comment added 17:07, 19 April 2003 (UTC)[reply]

While the point about William's distinctively awful spelling is perfectly valid, the "cokernut" example is inappropriate, as some dictionaries list this as a valid alternative spelling of "coconut".Jon Rob 11:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mention may be made of William's atrocious spelling when framing letters, signboards etc. "Cokernut" for coconut is a typical example. Perhaps the only time William writes a letter more or less correctly is in the "Begging Letter" episode, that too because he copies out another letter verbatim. William's dog Jumble deserves special mention, especially with reference to his master's grand plans for him. Some other staple William characters are the retired Gen. Moult, Farmer Jenks, and Mr. French (Frenchie), his form master. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.168.71 (talk) 17:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just William (by Richmal Crompton)

This has been posted on Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities, can anyone help? adamsan 22:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC):[reply]

I would be grateful if you could please answer the following questions about the story “William and the Nasties” which appeared in the book “William the Detective.”

1. You write that “Crompton herself [who died in 1969] decided that the story was inappropriate and had it removed.” From which impression of the edition published by George Newnes did it stop appearing?
2. You also write that it appeared in the Armada Paperback edition published in the 1970s. Did it appear in all the editions brought out by Armada?
3. Macmillan Publishers said in 1999 that they had withdrawn this story “several years ago.” In which year did they do this?

Thank you. (Dr.) C. Simons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamsan (talk • contribs) 22:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Play.com are listing Just William as a DVD release (series one) for August 2007. The timings (13 episodes at 25 minutes) seem to tally to the 70's series, but it's not officially announced as such. I guess we should wait until we see more details. Geffers 10:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a dvd to be released but it's coming out in 2020! Carla 10.13, 14 July 2008 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.163.175 (talk) 09:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Outlaws

The separate page linked in this article has shrunk so much that there is no point keeping it, and I've proposed that it be merged here. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 04:45, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged it. However, I'm in doubt as to whether it would make more sense to merge that section into the Just William series article - it seems like duplication of material to leave it here. --Alvestrand (talk) 03:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction needs sorting out

Text: The Fall of the Idol - William makes friends with his teacher's new girlfriend.

Caption of picture: William makes friends with his teacher's "new beau", much to her annoyance (from the story The Fall of the Idol)

A "beau" is a boyfriend. Which is the teacher, and which is the love interest?. If "beau" is being used incorrectly for girlfriend, then you've got the oddity of her being annoyed at being made friends with. A female teacher annoyed at William making friends with her boyfriend is inevitable, but is this what's meant? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Koro Neil (talk • contribs) 14:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The teacher is Miss Drew. The story actually calls the gentleman: "a male cousin - a very nice-looking male cousin, with whom she often went for walks in the evening." What is really going on, though, is that William has developed an adoration for his teacher and wants to spend time with her. The cousin seems to enjoy William's company. However Miss Drew wants to be alone with her cousin - she doubtless sees enough of William in class (by the way, romance between cousins is not traditionally disapproved of in England) There may be a mix-up here with the story "William the Intruder", in which William intrudes on another romance. Robina Fox (talk) 14:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Books?

Though the William books were, and are, undoubtedly read with great pleasure by children the stories were originaly published with an adult readership in mind.

As a result one of the unusual aspects of these 'children's' books is their vocabulary, which is often beyond all but the most erudite child.

It is rare to find two consecutive pages which would not have even a very educationally-advanced child 'reaching for a dictionary' at least once - and probably many adults too.

Happily the stories are so fluidly written that an inabilty to understand many of the words doesn't detract from their sense for a child reading them. Perhaps that reflects real life experience - all children encounter words they don't understand every day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.159.8 (talk) 18:35, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Just William. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515144457/http://www.sharpsoftware.co.uk/william/ to http://www.sharpsoftware.co.uk/william/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]