Talk:Counter-Strike: Source
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Important Changes in beta
[edit]One of the new features introduced in the beta is the multi-core rendering. I will add it as an important mention, since it makes the game more playable on any machine that has a multi-core processor. This is especially relevant to older machines. Ds1GIG (talk) 05:27, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
I don't know how to open a new article but in the history section it never states when the game was released publicly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.87.51.244 (talk) 06:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
System Requirements
[edit]The linux ones are just copied from windows: linux doesn't use directx. 96.255.72.75 (talk) 21:39, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out. I've just changed them to match the system requirements listed on the CS:S Steam page. The1337gamer (talk) 21:45, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Abbreviation
[edit]While the abbreviation "CS:S" is commonly used by the community, the referenced source (http://store.steampowered.com/css) makes no mention of it. 24.14.112.248 (talk) 20:35, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Reader feedback: Is there any character backg...
[edit]58.169.185.36 posted this comment on 2 February 2014 (view all feedback).
Is there any character background info? if so, add plz
We can add that too, I'll go through the wiki and research on the characters involved in the game.
GideonWanna talk? 07:35, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Counter-Strike: Source. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120709101053/http://www.1up.com/reviews/counter-strike-source to http://www.1up.com/reviews/counter-strike-source
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
CS Malvinas: Relevance, Importance, & Bias
[edit]I have just rewritten Counter-Strike: Source#Modifications's sole enttry, which is currently about Counter-Strike: Malvinas. When I found this section, it was biased in favor of Britain and incorrectly, repeatedly insisted that this was a standalone game, not simply a map for CS:S.
I question the relevance & importance of this section altogether, and do not think it should have its own article. While the controversy and hacking may warrant a brief mention, they are not the extent of CS:S's modifications.
I think a solid way forward for the article (regardless of if we keep the Malvinas mention) would be to turn the "Modifications" section into "Notable Modifications" and list/describe common CS:S gamemodes such as gungame, kz, surf, jailbreak, etc and a separate mention for the game's huge mapping scene. Malvinas could be mentioned here, along with the controversy, though I am again not sure if it should remain at all.
Any guidance appreciated.
Kaceydotme (talk) 21:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Realized something like what I would like to do for CSS has been done for Garry's Mod: Garry's Mod#User-created content Kaceydotme (talk) 04:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)