Jump to content

Commission on the Filipino Language

Coordinates: 14°35′55″N 120°59′51″E / 14.59873°N 120.99753°E / 14.59873; 120.99753
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Commission on the Filipino Language
Filipino: Komisyon sa Wikang Filipino

Facade of official headquarters
Agency overview
FormedNovember 13, 1936; 87 years ago (1936-11-13)[1] (first formation)
August 14, 1991; 33 years ago (1991-08-14)[2] (present form)
JurisdictionGovernment of the Philippines
HeadquartersSan Miguel, Manila, Philippines
14°35′55″N 120°59′51″E / 14.59873°N 120.99753°E / 14.59873; 120.99753
Annual budget₱107.53 million (2018)[3]
Agency executives
  • Arthur P. Casanova, Chairperson
  • Comm. Benjamin M. Mendillo, Jr., Commissioner for Finance and Administration
  • Comm. Milet Abduhraman, Commissioner for Programs and Projects
  • Atty. Marites A. Barrios-Taran, Director General
Parent departmentOffice of the President
Key documents
Websitekwf.gov.ph Edit this at Wikidata
Official historical marker
Alternate logo used on official social media pages

The Commission on the Filipino Language (CFL),[2] also referred to as the Komisyon sa Wikang Filipino (KWF),[a] is the official regulating body of the Filipino language and the official government institution tasked with developing, preserving, and promoting the various local Philippine languages.[4][5] The commission was established in accordance with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines.

Established by Republic Act No. 7104 in 1991,[2] the commission is a replacement for the Institute of Philippine Languages (IPL; Linangan ng mga Wika sa Pilipinas) that was set up in 1987 which was a replacement of the older Institute of National Language (INL; Surian ng Wikang Pambansa), established in 1937 as the first government agency to foster the development of a Philippine national language.[6]

History

[edit]

The 1st National Assembly of the Philippines passed Commonwealth Act No. 184 of 1936, establishing the Institute of National Language (Surian ng Wikang Pambansa).[1] On January 12, 1937, President Manuel L. Quezon appointed the members to compose the INL. By virtue of Executive Order No. 134 issued and signed by President Quezon on December 30, 1937, approved the adoption of Tagalog as the basis of the national language, and declared and proclaimed the national language based on Tagalog, as the national language of the Philippines.[7] Quezon himself was born & raised in Baler, Aurora, which is a native Tagalog-speaking area. In 1938, the INL was dissolved and replaced with the National Language Institute. Its purpose was to prepare for the nationwide teaching of the Tagalog-based national language (Wikang Pambansa na batay/base sa Tagalog) by creating a dictionary and a grammar book with a standardized orthography. In the school year of 1940–1941, the teaching of the national language (wikang pambansa), with its new standardized orthography, was set by law in the fourth year of all high schools in both public and private schools throughout the country.[8] The Tagalog-based national language was taught in school only as one of the subject areas in 1940, but was not adapted as the medium of instruction.

During World War II, the Japanese occupiers encouraged the use of the national language rather than English in schools. The Tagalog-based national language was, therefore, propagated not only in education but also in mass media and in official communication. The census for 1948 reported that 7,126,913 people or 37.11% of the population spoke the language, representing an increase of 11.7% from the 1939 figure of 4,068,565. Of these seven million people, 47.7% learnt it as a second language.[9]

The current commission was established by Republic Act No. 7104 of 1991,[2] replacing the Institute of Philippine Languages (IPL) that was previously set up in January 1987 (Executive Order No. 117);[10] itself, a replacement of the older Institute of National Language (INL), established in 1937.[6]

In October 2018, the KWF announced in its newsletter Diyaryo Filipino (Filipino Newspaper) its bringing online a National Dictionary in compliance with the commission's Ortograpiyang Pambansa (National Orthography) of 2013.[11][12] According to the same October 2018 newsletter, also in the works (in experimental and pilot-testing stage) is an official spellcheck in accordance with the Ortograpiyang Pambansa (National Orthography) and the Manwal sa Masinop na Pagsulat (Manual to Provident/Neat/Careful Writing).[13]

Original commission members (circa 1937)

[edit]
  • Jaime C. de Veyra (Waray-Waray Visayan), Chairman[7]
  • Santiago A. Fonacier (Ilocano), Member
  • Casimiro F. Perfecto (Bicolano), Member
  • Felix S. Salas Rodriguez (Hiligaynon Visayan), Member
  • Filemon Sotto (Cebuano Visayan), Member
  • Cecilio López (Tagalog), Member and Secretary
  • Hadji Butu (Moro), Member

Board of Commissioners (present)

[edit]
  • Arthur P. Casanova (Chairman of the Commission / Tagapangulo)
  • Jose Kervin Cesar B. Calabias (Mga Wika sa Kahilagaang Pamayanang Kultural / Languages of Northern Cultural Communities)
  • Alain Dimzon (Hiligaynon)
  • Hope Yu (Cebuano)
  • Resigned (Pangasinan)
  • Resigned (Kapampangan)
  • Benjamin Mendillo Jr. (Ilocano)
  • Angela Lorenzana. (Bicolano)
  • Carmelita C. Abdurahman (Waray)
  • Abe Sakili (Mga Wika sa Muslim Mindanao / Languages of Muslim Mindanao)
  • Benjamin Mendillo Jr. (OIC-Director General of the Commission)

Language diversity

[edit]

The Philippines is one of the most linguistically diverse countries in the world. With 175 distinct native languages (sometimes incorrectly termed dialects), it has about 3% of the world's languages, yet only 0.2% of Earth's land area, making the Philippines 15 times more diverse than average in terms of language diversity.[14]

Ethnologue, a compendium of world languages, notes that 28 Philippine languages are in trouble, up from 13 in 2016. Eleven languages are dying, and several are already extinct. The Living Tongues Institute for Endangered Languages has identified the Philippines as being one of the top 10 "language hotspots" of the world, which means that the Philippines has a wealth of languages but such languages are being lost at a rate faster than those languages can be documented properly.[14]

Ethnologue's estimates are conservative, as many linguists have noted that many endangered languages in the Philippines. All 32 Negrito languages of the Philippines are endangered (Headland, 2003), and the Komisyon sa Wikang Filipino has identified approximately 50 endangered languages.[14]

Endangered Filipino Languages List

[edit]

A 2015 study by the Commission updated the list of endangered languages in the Philippines. The Commission noted that there are 37 languages in the country that are now endangered, mostly Aeta languages in Luzon and Visayas, notably Negros Occidental. The Kinarol-an language Barangay Carol-an, Kabankalan, Negros Occidental was considered as extinct as it was no longer being used in casual conversations. The study also noted that the Inagtâ Isaróg language of Goa, Ocampo and Tigaon in Camarines Sur had only one remaining speaker in 2015.[15]

The Árta language of Nagtipunan, Quirino is considered nearly extinct as only 11 persons are speaking the language. Languages that are moribund (near extinction) include: the Inatá language of Cadiz City, Negros Occidental; Álta language of Aurora, Nueva Ecija; and Ayta Magbukun language of Abucay, Bataan. The Ayta Magbukun has at least 114 practicing families, while the others range from only 29 to 113 persons.[15]

Meanwhile, the threatened languages with more than a thousand speakers remaining are Álta Kabulowán of Gabaldon, Nueva Ecija; Ayta Mag-Indí of Pampanga and Zambales; and Gubatnón Mangyán of Magsaysay, Occidental Mindoro.[15]

Those that have lessening usage include Inagta Irayá of Buhi, Camarines Sur; Binaták of Palawan; Manidé of Camarines Norte; Ayta Kadí of Quezon Province; Ayta Ambalá of Zambales and Bataan; Ayta Mag-antsi of Tarlac, Nueva Ecija, and Zambales; Ténap (Agta Dupaningan) of Cagayan and Isabela; Bolinaw of Pangasinan; Agta Dumagat Casiguran of Isabela and Aurora; and Agtâ Dumagat Umíray of Aurora and Quezon Province.[15]

Part also of the list are languages which the KWF consider as under threat and needing further studies. These are Manobo Kalamansíg of Sultan Kudarat; Ratagnón Mangyán of Occidental Mindoro; Îguwák of Nueva Vizcaya; Karáw of Benguet; Tagabulos of Aurora, Bulacan, and Quezon Province; Bangon Mangyán of Oriental Mindoro; Manobo Ilyanen of Cotabato; Gâdang of Mountain Province; Kalamyanën of Palawan; Tadyawan Mangyán of Oriental Mindoro; Finallíg of Barlig, Mountain Province; Menuvú of Bukidnon; Tawbuwíd Mangyán of Occidental and Oriental Mindoro; Manóbo Arománën of Cotabato; Manóbo Tigwahánon of Bukidnon; and Abéllen of Tarlac. Also listed under threat is the Irungdungan (Agta Isirigan) of Cagayan but the KWF observes a rising number of speakers.[15]

The Commission, with the much-needed cooperation and initiated of provincial and local governments, embarked on a landmark project on language revitalization in Abucay, Bataan in 2018, helping the Ayta Magbukun communities in the town's village of Bangkal through Bahay Wika where young members of the ethnic group are being taught of their language by two elders.[15]

Criticism

[edit]

One major criticism of the commission is that it supposedly fails in its goal of further developing the Filipino language.[16] This is grounded in the fact that Filipino is essentially Tagalog, a fact acknowledged by former Commissioner, Ricardo María Durán Nolasco, and with an impoverished technical and scientific vocabulary, at that, which relies heavily on foreign borrowings and, often, constructions. It is often left to the universities to develop their own respective terminologies for each field, leading to a lack of uniformity and general public disuse.

It is argued that current state of the Filipino language is contrary to the intention of Republic Act (RA) No. 7104 that requires that the national language be developed and enriched by the lexicon of the country's other languages.[17]

On June 1, 2024, the coalitions of Philippine Federation of the Deaf and Alliance of Concerned Teachers staged a protest-rally at Liwasang Bonifacio against the CFL-Arthur P. Casanova, for the cultural retention of Filipino Sign Language (Republic Act 11106).[18] The members said the FSL Unit of the CFL abolition will effectively layoff the deaf personnel, “thus, depriving Deaf Filipinos of their language rights and violating the mandate of RA 7104.”[19][20]

See also

[edit]
Defunct language regulators

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ In other Philippine languages:

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Commonwealth Act No. 184 (November 13, 1936), An Act to Establish A National Language Institute and Define Its Powers and Duties, Official Gazette, archived from the original on April 9, 2023, retrieved May 29, 2020
  2. ^ a b c d Republic Act No. 7104 (August 14, 1991), Commission on the Filipino Language Act, Supreme Court E-library, retrieved May 29, 2020
  3. ^ "Other executive offices" (PDF). www.dbm.gov.ph. December 29, 2017. Retrieved February 24, 2020.
  4. ^ "Wika / Misyon at Bisyon". wika.pbworks.com.
  5. ^ Gonzalez, Andrew (1988). "The Language Planning Situation in the Philippines" (PDF). Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 19 (5&6). multilingual-matters.net: 508. eISSN 1747-7557. ISSN 0143-4632. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 16, 2007. The Commission was charged with the mission not only to develop Filipino as a language of literature and as an academic language but likewise to preserve and develop the other languages.
  6. ^ a b Catacataca, Pamfilo. "The Commission on the Filipino Language". Archived from the original on March 6, 2012. Retrieved June 24, 2010.
  7. ^ a b Executive Order No. 134 (December 30, 1937), "Proclaiming the National Language of the Philippines based on the "Tagalog" Language" (PDF), Quezon.ph, retrieved June 24, 2010
  8. ^ Pangilinan, Michael Raymon. "Kapampángan or Capampáñgan: Settling the Dispute on the Kapampángan Romanized Orthography" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 26, 2009. Retrieved June 22, 2010.
  9. ^ Belvez, Paz. "Development of Filipino, the national language of the Philippines". Archived from the original on March 6, 2012. Retrieved June 24, 2010.
  10. ^ Executive Order No. 117 (January 30, 1987), Reorganization of the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports Prescribing Its Powers and Functions and for Other Purposes, Official Gazette, archived from the original on April 11, 2023, retrieved May 29, 2020
  11. ^ "Ortograpiyang Pambansa". Komisyon ng Wikang Pambansa. January 1, 2014.
  12. ^ "Onlayn na ang Pambansang Diksiyonaryo!(Tagalog: The National Dictionary is Now Online!)" (PDF). Diyaryo Filiino (Filipino Newspaper). Komisyon sa Wikang Filipino. October 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 27, 2018. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
  13. ^ Pelagio, Earvin (October 2018). "Spellcheck para sa Filipino(Tagalog: Spellcheck for Filipino)" (PDF). Diyaryo Filiino (Filipino Newspaper). Komisyon sa Wikang Filipino. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 27, 2018. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
  14. ^ a b c Philippines, Multilingual (September 3, 2019). "[OPINION] Our languages are in trouble, so what?". Rappler.
  15. ^ a b c d e f Sembrano, Edgar Allan M. (February 11, 2019). "KWF lists endangered Phl languages". Daily Tribune. Archived from the original on June 22, 2020. Retrieved September 7, 2019.
  16. ^ "New center to document Philippine dialects". Asian Journal. Philippine Daily Inquirer. June 18, 2007. Archived from the original on September 29, 2007. Retrieved June 30, 2007.
  17. ^ Congressional Record : Plenary Proceedings of the 14th Congress, First Regular Session : House of Representatives Archived June 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Vol. 1, No. 11, August 14, 2007, pp. 455-460 (Rep. López opens the discussion)
  18. ^ Republic Act No. 11106 (October 30, 2018), The Filipino Sign Language Act (PDF), Congress of the Philippines, retrieved August 5, 2024
  19. ^ Cruz, Norman (May 31, 2024). "Don't abolish Filipino sign language". Manila Standard. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
  20. ^ Marcelo, Elizabeth (June 1, 2024). "CFL slammed over plan to abolish sign language unit". The Philippine Star. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commission_on_the_Filipino_Language&oldid=1254224782"