Talk:Classical genetics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Medicine: Genetics Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Medical genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Summaries of this article appear in gene and genetics.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mariahfaithh.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Laurel- Since you mentioned the diploid individual you should go ahead and mention the haploid individual under "basic definitions". Should define reverse genetics What were some the techniques used before the advent of molecular biology?

- - - - Where are your sources???*****

Should mention who discovered genetic linkage Great article, very well written!

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ewells2013, DrarSoaad, Inbornone, Radhikabhake.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

radhika

The article is well written but the part written in methods section is general idea as how the method was developed.So I feel it should be under different section. Radhikabhake (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I

I think that this entry should include some info. on the use of mutants in mapping genes, this was achieved well before the genetic code was known.--nixie 01:12, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I agree. Be bold, feel free to add! --Lexor|Talk 09:05, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)

massive revert

I just did a massive revert on the page. I don't know what Rscavetta was trying to say with his large rewrite, but it sounded kind of weird to me. And incoherent. And possibly wrong. He doesn't appear to be an active user, so I'm just commenting on this here. It's disconcerting to see that his edits were made over a year ago, but I guess no one felt qualified to question his addition. -Madeleine 00:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merge this page

This page should be merged with "Forward Genetics." Forward Genetics = Classical Genetics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.231.246.1 (talk) 23:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

edit

  These article can have a history section that will show how classical genetics was discovered. The methods and techniques should have a section so the topic can be more understandable and more complete.

^[1]^[2]^[3]|publisher=Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}}</ref> Marialopez pabon (talk) 02:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is very informative. However, I feel that the section basic definitions is not necessary and could be included in another section! There is a lot of information on the page that does not have any citations. It would be beneficial to support this information with great and reliable references.Ewells2013 (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2017 (UTC) Ewells2013 (talk) 22:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Alberts, Bruce (2014). Molecular biology of the cell. [S.l.]: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780815344322.
^ Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's legacy : the origin of classical genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. ISBN 978-0-879696-75-7.
^ Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's legacy : the origin of classical genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. ISBN 978-0-879696-75-7.

[1] Alberts, Bruce (2014). Molecular biology of the cell. [S.l.]: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780815344322.

[2] Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's legacy : the origin of classical genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. ISBN 978-0-879696-75-7.

[3] Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's legacy : the origin of classical genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. ISBN 978-0-879696-75-7.

[1]

[2]

[3]