Talk:Mark Rosewater

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Magic: The Gathering

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magic: The Gathering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Magic: The Gathering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Magic: The GatheringWikipedia:WikiProject Magic: The GatheringTemplate:WikiProject Magic: The GatheringMagic: The Gathering articles

Untitled

In hindsight I see that my comments on his controversy were not fully up to Wikipedian standards, but I think it's inappropriate to give the controversy no mention whatsoever. Having played the game for some time, though not so much anymore, I know there are legions (pardon the pun) of "old-schoolers" who see his name as synonymous with everything that is bad about the game. I wholeheartedly believe Wikipedia should include such content. --BDD 18:42, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

If you can word it more neutrally, and perhaps cite a specific source for that opinion, it can probably be added back. The previous version overshadowed the rest of the article with the "controversy" which, frankly, is not Mark's fault alone. -- Netoholic @ 21:21, 2005 Mar 15 (UTC)

External link to archive

The external link to the archive gives 404. Does anyone have archive of all Maro's articles?Linkato1 (talk) 19:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed [1] codl (talk) 11:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article linked from magicthegathering.com

This article was mentioned today on the official Magic: The Gathering site, here. Brace for impact. :) --Ashenai 11:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't anyone mention that he wrote for "Roseanne"? That comes up in pretty much every article he writes. (Xanitross 13:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Well, he's not really known for his work for Roseanne. Nonetheless, you're probably right, it could be mentioned. Wanna do the honors? :) --Ashenai 14:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Freelance work

Isn't there a mistake in the article? At the start of the paragraph Magic: The Gathering, there is mention of his freelance work, in 2010 and 2011! Given that these years haven't come to pass, I guess the writer ment 1990 and 1991, but I'm not sure. Could anyone who does know have a look? -- MisteR

Bill Rose

The article links to a stub for William I. Rose, I don't think it is the right person. 173.67.40.111 (talk) 18:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]