Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Worbarrow Bay

Worbarrow Bay

For a while I've been wanting to put some of my work to the vote but never felt it quite worthy. This one though I think is an interesting, asthetic and unusual subject that does the job of illustrating its topic, and adds to the effect of the Tyneham article, with very minimal technical problems (he says overconfidently). Joe D (t) 03:57, 30 May 2005 (UTC) (P.S., if anybody wants to play around with the levels, the original file is here. The full size version is all rights reserved, but any modified file if in jpg format and reduced in size to 1024px wide maximum can be released cc-by-sa.)[reply]

Self-nom and support. Joe D (t) 03:57, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Sorry, I just don't like the fence and the signs, they take away from the subject too much. --Silversmith Hewwo 10:28, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. A nice picture, but not quite striking. Deltabeignet 01:24, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - The horizon is sloping - Adrian Pingstone 08:01, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Do you mean the picture's not aligned right, or do you mean you don't like the asymetry? I double checked with the section of sea and the alignment is right. Joe D (t) 11:04, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Humble apologies, I goofed, the horizon is indeed level (but I'm afraid I still oppose) -
- Adrian Pingstone 12:54, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support - everyone is being rather harsh - V1 though - two is too light A curate's egg 19:30, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Not promoted +2 / -3 -- Solipsist 08:02, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)