User talk:Plastictv

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --MarkSweep 02:38, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Moving articles

I don't know about the issues entailed in moving Chinese courtesy name to Chinese style name, and checking the Talk: page didn't help me either. Please make sure, when moving articles, to give a clear rationale for why you're moving them, either in the note when you move them, or preferably, on the article's Talk page. Also, and this is what really spurred me to write you, after you move an article, check the "What links here" link on the lefthand side of the page, and go and change the wikilinks in those articles as appropriate, so that they point to the new article. Thanks for your time, and thanks for devoting your efforts to the wikipedia project! Tomer ^TALK 06:38, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

It's OK. What you did doesn't bother me, I just thought I'd give you a heads up. :-) You may find it difficult to move the article back as easily as it was moved the first time, because doing so would require overwriting an already existing page (i.e., a redirect page pointing to the new name). It will probably require that you communicate with a superuser/admin to accomplish the task. Your rationale for proposing to move it back sounds well-founded, but you might want to check first to make sure that the google hits are substantive, and not the result of a google bomb (albeit on a very small scale :-)) (inadvertent or otherwise). My only other recommendation is to bring up proposed moves on the Talk: pages first...and then wait a full week for input from other contributors before going through with the move. Also, it took me a minute to figure out how to get ahold of you (I'd forgotten your username :-/), so on talk pages, try to remember to "sign" your posts by ending them with four tildes ~ ~ ~ ~ (<- like that, only without the spaces in between). Tomer ^TALK 01:47, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)

Image tag

I noticed you uploaded Image:Cao Cao.jpg, it would be great if you could give images an image copyright tag when you upload them. :) - Stoph 08:39, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for the advice, but i think i'd now re-upload the image under a new name. Who can i approach to delete the current image? --Plastictv 08:51, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Took care of that for you. Image:Cao Cao.jpg has been deleted. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 09:16, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Didn't realize so much is involved in uploading an image... --Plastictv 15:51, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Cao Cao

Speaking of Cao Cao, you're doing a great job, as far as I can tell! I'm impressed, keep up the good work! - Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 08:43, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. Great knowing i'm being appreciated. :) --Plastictv 08:51, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Cao Xiong

The date of Cao Xiong's birth is at the Japanese wikipedia. [1] If you do not believe me, please go ahead and see for yourself.

Tan 15:35, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As you might have noticed, there are question marks behind those dates. And i'm quite sure the author of the Japanese article got the dates from one of the many Romance of the Three Kingdoms-related games around. --Plastictv 12:10, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for offering your help to copyedit the article, but please further familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style, particularly with regard to the bolding of terms. :) --Plastictv 12:58, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. I kind of have been doing a thing where I bolded names the first time they were mentioned, but I had been hoping to locate something that would give me more specific guidance on that, specifically hoping I wouldn't have to go back and change stuff I'd done. :-). Thanks for pointing me to the Manual of Style. However, I couldn't actually find anything specifically referring to bolding, I may have overlooked it, if I did I apologise, but could you help me by directing me specifically to where bolding is discussed? I would like to make sure I follow the correct guidelines. Best regards, EvilPhoenix 16:33, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

RfC: Tan

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mr Tan is open; you might want to say a few things. JM Bell ° 14:21, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but i don't have a personal opinion towards the user. And i'd prefer not to get too involved in the political aspects of Wikipedia, however inevitable or necessary that might be. --Plastictv 05:55, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Clans

I found the Clans at the end of the article sometimes too long. How about move the clan parts to seperate articles? For example, Cao Cao had 25 sons, and not all of them are noteworthy.--Skyfiler 02:42, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

Well at first i didn't see the point of linking to all the relatives at all. But you placed the links (many of them ghost ones) under "See also", which in my opinion looked messy (and readers wouldn't see at a glance how these other people are related to the person they're reading about). That's why i opened the Clans sections. i don't quite agree to opening up new articles just to contain the Clans info as it is merely supplementary. --Plastictv 04:05, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Qian Zhongshu

I've attempted to explain the situation in talk:Qian Zhongshu, do feel free to add your contribution. :) -- Tonync 16:21, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from Boil1202

您好，感谢您对"Ningde"的修改, 我是新来的, 对Wikipedia的认识很少, 英文程度也不好, 请多多给我指教。/boil1202

哈哈，你让我不知道要用什么语言回复你。 i guess i'll just say you're welcome. :) --Plastictv 03:43, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hello, My wife comes from Ningde. So I have been to Ningde. She and I admire your excellent English, which is our dream. But till now it haven't come true. Where are you come from? USA? Which state? Where is your hometown? I am glad to communicate with you. How about you?

Boil1202 04:54, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi, i guess i could say i hailed from Ningde, having spent ten years of my life there. My ancestral roots were in Gutian County, though i've never been there. And, oh my, my English is nowhere near excellent (as Mel Etitis might be quick to point out). Don't worry about your English. As long as you offer coherent and useful contents, someone will soon clean 'em up (like i had found out). :) --Plastictv 08:30, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi Plastictv, I have told my wife your message,and, I will push my wife to write more about Gutian County. I am a specialist at King Circuits Co. Ltd.. If you come Taoyuan, I and my wife will treat you to a meal. We are so glad to know you. I had wrote a small article about PBB (a restrictive hazardous substances, by RoHS). Could you help me to let the article more friendly? thanks!! Boil1202 01:57, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the meal in advance then. :) i do have been wanting to visit Taiwan for the longest time. Anyway i did what i can for PBB but i have next to zero knowledge in the matter. So it'd be good if you could provide more info on issues such as how PBBs are manufactured and their characteristics (a picture would be excellent).

i'd also be interested (putting myself in a reader's shoe) in what kind of restrictions exist outside Europe (such as in Taiwan and mainland China), since the only kind of control you mentioned and i could find is the RoHS.

--Plastictv 07:16, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have seen the newest article "PBB" in Wikipedia. Thanks a lot. What you know about PBB has been much more than me. The structure of PBB like two benzene combine together. I have the structural drawing at a paper, but I don't know how to post it online now. The structure ofPBB(Polybrominated biphenyls) is more like biphenyl, "H" replaced by "Br". In EU, there are three environmental direction for electrical and electronic equipment: WEEE, RoHS, EuP. Europe is the most active area for environmental direction. Taiwan , mainland China, and USA just follow the standard of EU. There is another environmental direction, Kyoto Protocol in Japan. Boil1202 01:20, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oh my i've returned all my atoms and molecules to my bespectacled Chemistry teachers haha. And i really knew nothing about PBB prior to this. What you saw was the result of two hours of reading on the Internet.

Well correct me if i'm wrong, i understand PBBs to be a group of compounds, right? So what is the defining characteristic or structure of a PBB? What is its chemical formula? If you're able to scan the drawing you could either send it to my email at plastictv@gmail.com or upload it yourself onto Wikipedia database. Look for a link on the left that says "Upload File" or follow this link.

So does the Kyoto Protocol place restrictions on PBBs as well?

--Plastictv 08:22, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Three Kingdoms exploits

Hello, if you have some spare time, can you assist in editing the biographies Huang Zhong, Zhang Xiu, and Zhang Jiao? I'm very impressed by your knowledge of the characters during the Three Kingdoms era and look forward to your breathtaking revisions.

Hi, it's really more of an interest than knowledge. But i'll see what i can do for the three characters you specified, though i'm still working mainly on the characters of the Kingdom of Wei at present.

Please also open a new topic and sign off using four tildes (~). It will be automatically converted into your username and the datetime of your message. For a while i thought you were Boil1202.

--Plastictv 08:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Aesop's Fables and template:seemain

Seemain was used on the fables as well as Aesop. This is not seemain's intended use. Seemain was just an unclear version of subarticle, because main referred to something different in main than in seemain, compounded with the fact that their wording was the same. I think that the fables should probably be a subarticle of Aesop and I've made changes accordingly. If you disagree I suggest you go to Template talk:main and argue the need for a siblingarticle template. Just because a redirect breaks one thing doesn't mean it should be undone. You created a problem by misusing seemain and should solve this locally. --MarSch 3 July 2005 10:39 (UTC)

The North Wind and the Sun

Okay, I'll try to make clearer what I was trying to say. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 12:08, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i'm sorry but i'd think that the choice of the fable for the use of phonetic illustration is rather hmm... coincidental and (no offense meant) trivial. i'd like to rewrite the article, placing more focus on the moral of the fable (and maybe other relevant info if there's any), mentioning its use to illustrate phonetics only as a side point. What do you think? --Plastictv 15:12, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

I have no objection to you adding information about the fable itself and its moral, even putting it first and moving the information about its use to illustrated phonetics to a lower position (section 2 or 3 or something), but the fact is, people (like me) who are interested in phonetics and phonology really only know about this fable because we've read transcriptions of it in a dozen different languages. I didn't even know it was one of Aesop's fables until I did a Wikipedia search for the phrase "north wind and the sun". So add as much as you like to the article, but please don't delete the information I added. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 16:00, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it looks good. You're right about the narrow transcription saying "The North Wind and a Sun"; that's the way it's printed in the IPA Handbook, so if it's a mistake it isn't mine. But it probably isn't a mistake; I can easily imagine the [ð] of the being deleted after the [n] of an(d)' in rapid speech. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 19:36, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Huang Hao

I think you would agree that his section in Wikipedia is appaling, some idiot entered in one line about him. Unfortunately I don't know much about him, I'm pretty sure you could do a much better job, so if you have some spare time could you look into him please? --Tiresais 14:56, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite sure the "idiot" would have every good intention to make Wikipedia more complete. Nevertheless, i shall try my best to expand the stub on Huang Hao. --Plastictv 15:09, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe they did, but they entered one line that is a matter of opinion anyway... Never mind... I was just tired and cranky at the time. --Tiresais 18:04, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aesop

I'd like to suggest you've been a bit quick on the trigger here. Granted that the writing you deleted was badly written, most of it was, indeed, encyclopedic. In some contexts, statements such as The first great writer of great short fiction who ever lived... might be mere opinion, but Aesop's place among literary giants is undisputed. The flaw is in style, not content.

I offer you the task of improving this project, not by eliminating poorly-written text, but by bettering it. For example, the anon wrote: It is said the oracle at Delphi put Aesop to death out of jealousy. I‘m not surprised. You might drop the note of personal astonishment, first; then do a little research. Did the Oracle indeed command Aesop's death? Or does such a legend exist? Either way, can you source it?

It is a great weakness of the wiki universe that it is so much easier to destroy than to build. It is the work of a moment to touch the delete key and obliterate a paragraph or a page; it may take days of patient research to justify a single sentence. This makes positive contribution all the more vital.

I urge you to consider the points I've made today. I'll be returning to Aesop from time to time to see how you're doing. If you have any questions for me, please post them right here -- I'm watching. — Xiong 熊 talk * 14:36, 2005 August 13 (UTC)

Fragmented discussion merged from User talk:Xiong -- please avoid fragmented discussions. — Xiong 熊 talk * 14:47, 2005 August 14 (UTC)

To be honest, i rather don't like the way you suggested that i destroyed rather than constructed. Firstly, i did not harshly delete the edit but merely moved it to the talk page so that the unregistered editor, who took the effort to write it, would be read by readers who visit talk pages for more details, or at least other editors could make use of it if they want to. Secondly, jealousy of the Oracle is just one of the many theories over the cause of death of Aesop. In the main article there were already listed two. Perhaps you could add the rest if you like.

i, too, gently urge you to take a look at the history page of Aesop and notice on 2 July an overhaul to the article. It is a great weakness of the wiki universe that people do not put hands to projects themselves but expect things to happen. Make Aesop better if you are really concerned, i have him on my watchlist anyway. --Plastictv 12:07, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've already done a small bit of work on Aesop; yes, I may do more, but I have plenty of irons in the fire already. I can only do so much directly; past that point, I must seek to guide other editors to do what I am unable.

I won't quibble whether it is deleting or moving; either way, the content has been removed and nothing set in its place.

Parenthetically, I ask that if you wish to call my attention to certain work, that you link to the diff itself, viz: [2].

I suggest that you have acquired a feeling of ownership of your work, and resent the substandard writing of [3]. I see that earlier, just after the work to which you point, you got involved in a little spat over "subarticle" and template use. Later, you reverted [4] an anon with edit sum rv vandalism although it appears to my eye to have been not so much deliberate vandalism as a very poor effort. Then, you reverted [5]"attire" to "garb". This is not a healthy pattern -- to make substantial edits to an article, then revert subsequent editors for failing to conform to your vision. I would have much less to say if you continued to make substantial contributions to the article, but it looks to me like one big effort followed by adamant defense. I'm sure you can justify each action individually, but I look at the pattern of the whole.

Here's my suggestion: Unwatch the page if you've done. Let some other fellows have a crack at it. It's really, really easy to get overinvested in this thing. — Xiong 熊 talk * 15:19, 2005 August 14 (UTC)

Thanks for your concern, i'm generally very watchful about being overdefensive of my major edits. As you suggested, i indeed am able to explain each and every edit or reversion you pointed out above.

The spat over the subarticle template was not over Aesop, but triggered by a harsh decision by a user to modify the {{main}} and {{seemain}} without discussion.
Changing "garb" to "attire" was due to a mistaken impression that the former sounds informal, but in fact, "garb" is more appropriate and no less formal. You could consult the dictionary.
As for your "very poor effort", it's laughable. Changing "all claim" to "zxclaim" is a very poor effort?

The general trend is that i'm concerned about the article and therefore placed it on my watchlist, unlike many hit-and-run editors we might have around here. If i may be so bold, as a rather new member of this great community, to give you some suggestions, i might want to remind you to drop your self-appointed policing stance and make more concrete contributions. Up to date you've talked to other users 557 times but only made 143 edits to articles. A bit unbalanced eh? --Plastictv 08:05, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not Cop

Well, I made my comments; take them for what they're worth. You have a point about hit-and-run editors -- but the other extreme is getting overinvested and defensive about an article. My concern isn't so much the article; anyone can fish an edit out of history or talk and try to clean it up; nothing is ever lost. My concern is more that I'd like to see you grow in a direction both more useful to the project and less stressful to you personally.

You're welcome to criticize me; but I'm hardly a cop, self-appointed or otherwise. In fact I'm rather intolerant of the whole idea of self-appointed cops and view the official sort as a barely-necessary evil -- the fewer, the better. When I make a suggestion, it's just that -- a suggestion, not a snide threat. (I've been on the receiving end of many of those.) I think the way to deal with questionable edits is one-on-one, not by dragging articles, policies, and users through meaningless and contentious votes.

I'm not sure I should respond to your suggestion I've been of little use here. If you don't see any value in my work, perhaps there is none -- for you. But you stirred my mind enough for me to do something I generally don't -- I put together a few paragraphs on the work I've done here so far. It's a bit much with which to burden your user page; if you like, you can check it out at User:Xiong/Brag. — Xiong 熊 talk * 04:54, 2005 August 17 (UTC)

Well i wish to apologize for that last comment. That was the result of a little anger and irrationality, and very irrelevant as well. i guess everybody contributes in his or her own way. Although i still do not agree with you on my actions regarding Aesop (see below), i do sincerely want to express my apology for letting loose my tongue. --Plastictv 15:27, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i believe a certain degree of defensiveness and possessiveness is a must in Wikipedia. If one cannot stand by one's own edits, who would? As long as one does not become possessive to the point where one unreasonably blocks any effort by others to make change to a certain article, and as long as one respects the intention and explanation of another editor or a general consensus, it is well within acceptable limit. Our problem in Wikipedia is as much that people do not care what they put down as that people care too much. i don't know if you agree with me on this one? --Plastictv 15:27, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jiangjun

Hi, perhaps that was a bit quick on the trigger? The discussion was not seven-day old yet and a general consensus was not forming. As you might notice, the rename votes were generally not backed up by valid reasons while the delete votes were. Furthermore, those who voted rename generally have at best preliminary knowledge in the Chinese language. What do you suggest that i do now, as the advocate for deletion of the "Chiangchun" article? Should i start a VfD for Jiangjun as well? Thanks. --Plastictv 05:31, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Plastictv, Thanks for your comments. The general period for VfD deliberation is five days, not seven, and the page was past the five day mark. I counted it as 4 votes for delete, and 5 votes to redirect. This is less than half in favor of deletion, which in my opinion is not enough of a consensus for deletion to qualify to delete, and therefore I attempted to implement the consensus to redirect, which was unanimous among those voting keep. Both those voting to redirect and those voting for deletion seemed to have valid reasons, in my interpretation. If you wish to nominate Jiangjun for deletion, personally I would reccomend waiting some time, as the article it was merged with only just survived a VfD, however:

A. It is not the exact same article.
B. Most of the article content was deleted, and it is now a stub.

So there might be justification for going ahead with a deletion nomination for Jianjun, which I leave to your discretion. If I may be of further assistance, please let me know. Best regards, Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 06:56, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. i'll see what i can do with Jiangjun, which in my opinion shouldn't stay as well. :) --Plastictv 07:41, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Three Kingdoms

Hi, sorry to bother you but i'm not very sure with what to do in this matter. A vote on renaming Category:Heroes of the Three Kingdoms had been conducted and the decision is to rename to Category:People of the Three Kingdoms. Besides creating the new category, should i keep an archive of the discussion in the talk page of the new category? And could you help delete the old one? Does it work like that? Thanks so much! :) --Plastictv 14:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest going ahead with creating the new category, archiving the discussion in the new category, and submitting the old category to Categories for deletion. And I can't help you delete the old one, I'm not an admin, but CfD is probably the way to go on that one anyway. Best regards, Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 15:18, August 18, 2005 (UTC).

Help

Hi, sorry to bother you about this little doubt: Do i get an admin to delete the old category once decision had been made to rename it? This is with regard to renaming Category:Heroes of the Three Kingdoms to Category:People of the Three Kingdoms. Thanks a lot! :) --Plastictv 15:36, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no, we list it at the bottom of WP:CFD in cleanup and after the articles get moved, by whoever, then an admin will delete the category. So feel free to help move the articles, but dont worry about the cat, it will get deleted :) ∞Who ?¿? 15:40, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- I'm glad to be able to help! Nandesuka 04:32, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lü Bu

plastictv, to address your questions, i need to ask 2 questions: first, do you read or write the chinese language (or mandarin). this is pertinent to the interpretation of the RTK text. the second question is, is your english proficiency certified? thanks! Chensiyuan 02:29, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Yes i read and write the Chinese language. Is my English proficiency certified? i don't know... been using it for a long time and nobody ever asked if it's certified. Does that answer your question? Btw you could reply at your own talk page the next time, i'll check there. :) --Plastictv 08:14, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i've been waiting for your reply. May i go ahead and amend the abovementioned article now? --Plastictv 02:54, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sun (disambiguation)

I reverted your edit to Sun (disambiguation) with an explanation on its talk page. I'm happy to discuss it. --Commander Keane 06:40, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

Question--Beijing Opera

Do you know a lot about Beijing opera? I'd like to create an article on the opera "Farewell my Concubine" (NOT the movie) and was interested in finding collaborators. (Haha, my goal is to get it listed on "did you know"--don't tell ;) ) So far it seems like one doesn't exist. Thanks! --Dpr 08:24, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As much as i'd love to, i don't know much about Peking Opera, except that i prefer this old term to "Beijing Opera". :) But you go ahead and get it started, pal. i'll try my best to support the project. --Plastictv 14:48, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Thanks a lot! --Dpr 02:33, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Xu Huang

Plastictv, I can understand why you dislike Xu Huang being associated with pop cultural representations, for example in the form of games and animations. However, encyclopaedias are not necessarily confined to the reporting of historical data. It encompasses a wider range of issues, and perhaps, you would say then such pop cultural phenomena should be mentioned under a separate category.

I think however that to give it a mere whisper of a mention somewhere else is underestimating the impact of what pop culture has had. I play Dynasty Warriors and I completely dislike how many of the generals are portrayed (so many of them are portrayed as feminine and many facts are distorted) - but there is little doubt that it is not impossible that more people have played koei ROTK games than read the novel itself, of which there are already several version of ROTK, and Three Kingdoms.

Another reason why I think it is important to talk about how Xu Huang is portrayed in modern times is because pop culture has been very influential. Historical record should of course be the best source, but you must admit too that some of the records regarding the Three Kingdoms are either contradictory to one another (I'm talking in a general sense, not about Xu), or some information is missing. I know it sucks to have a historical record of Xu Huang vitiated by nonsensical modern portrayals, especially a 'special mention' of how Xu portrayed today in games and what not, but the fact is that many young people take those as facts.

I think you know my point. I also understand that you prefer to have the informantion on Xu Huang which I entered recently inserted in another cateogry. But frankly, are we all not talking about Xu Huang? Isn't it easier to talk about Xu Huang in one single article?

The final issue is why talk about Koei and Xu Huang only. Well I was not going to end there. Xu was an important general and Koei underlines that too.

If you say, however, that in the example of say George Bush, it would be inappropriate to have an entry on Michael Moore or South Park portrays him, I would probably agree. It should be the other way round, in the sense they are the subset. But in this case, because of the sheer impact of an ever growing pop cultural sensationalisation of ROTK by Koei, when people do a wiki search on Xu Huang, they would probably half-expect to see Xu as what they saw in their animation and games.

Discussion continued at User talk:Chensiyuan.

Aesop

I'm afraid I'm going to have to go with Wetman on this. I think he's right that Aesop is more a legendary figure than a historical one (just like Homer), and I don't find his edit in violation of the NPOV policy. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 13:52, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Analects/Confucius

Thanks for leaving a comment. Check out my reply at Talk:Analects of Confucius. I'm not trying to contentious or anything...And thanks for your concern about my article--no, I'm not even close yet. Best, --Dpr 01:23, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

German

I had to look "schmachte" up in the dictionary; you spelled it right, but it's a very rare, literary verb. The sentence you gave is either ungrammatical or incomplete; it should be something like "Ich schmachte sehr, weil du mit mir nicht kommst" or "... weil du mit mir nicht kommen willst" or something like that. It means "I languish greatley because you don't (or won't) come with me." --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 17:35, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Telephone Numbering Plan

Hey Plastictv, nice edits with the Numbering Plan. I was wondering, how can you be a native speaker of both English and Chinese? Are you interested in editing articles in Wikiproject:Chinese Cities? Colipon+(T) 02:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i'm a native user of both since i'm a Chinese growing up in an English-speaking society? i'm not aware of the existence of such a Wikiproject (or are you proposing it now?), but i'm already taking up a one-man battle to standardize all articles on Chinese prefecture-level cities (i believe you have seen my user page). It'd be nice to have comrades in this campaign. :) --Plastictv 05:26, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Qian

Yeah, i know, and i'm thinking how to separate them neatly .... :P --K.C. Tang 04:07, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese maps

Okay, they're all deleted. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 19:39, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case any visitor of this page might read this and wonder, Angr was referring to several maps i produced earlier which regrettably had some copyright issues. i've requested that he delete them and since uploaded new ones onto Wikicommons. :) --Plastictv 02:38, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Zhejiang ones with copyright problems are now deleted too. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 12:37, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Hey, I like the way you've laid out the new maps of prefecture level zones. What program did you use? Are you doing this for all of China? Colipon+(T) 01:06, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Plastictv: Could you please make a map for Taizhou, Jiangsu as you have done to Taizhou, Zhejiang. I just love the map you made, and it's perfect. -- unsigned message from 129.105.116.194

Sure. i'll get on to that soon. :) --Plastictv 06:43, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the wonderful job on Taizhou, Jiangsu. Any plan to edit county-level cities in China? -- unsigned message from 129.105.116.194

You're welcome. i don't have any plan to do that as yet. There are enough prefecture-level cities to go about. --Plastictv 23:56, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But let me know if you have any particular request. :) --Plastictv 01:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Jiangyan City in Taizhou, Jiangsu?

Some Help Needed on AFD

Hi plastictv, how's it going. some chaps have taken issue to a movie i made in singapore and featured it on wikipedia. i want to get an opinion from you, or maybe even help me out at the article deletion discussion page. i admit there was some personal bias in the original rendition, but with the newer edits the basis of them calling for deletion is that the movie was 'non-notable'. i think it's a little presumptuous to call something non-notable when those people come from the far west, when i'm dealing with a singaporean film. do as you see fit, thanks. if they havent deleted it already, just do a search on 'Martyr Machiavellian'. Chensiyuan 05:36, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Dwelling in the Fuchun Mountains, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Sister Cities: List or Paragraph...???

User:Derek.cashman wants to change, and thinks, that all “Sister cities” lists in articles should be converted/changed to “paragraph” form. I don’t want to. Can you imagine a lists of 26 sister cities, like for Istanbul, and trying to read it in paragraph form? Please read my opinion and info and vote. I would really like your input! WikiDon 02:58, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Lu Xun.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lu Xun.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Matt 13:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response regarding the Lu Xun image. I see you also uploaded Image:Lu_Xun_Residence.jpg, should that one be deleted as well? Matt 16:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

infoboxes

Hi I've created infoboxes for the following cities, feel free to correct them and add information.

Abstrakt 01:43, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Eileen Chang 1968.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eileen Chang 1968.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 05:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Eileen_Chang.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eileen_Chang.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 13:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Eileen_Chang_Child.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eileen_Chang_Child.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 16:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cao Cao Opera.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cao Cao Opera.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 17:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Qian Zhongshu.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Qian Zhongshu.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 04:24, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also Image:Qi Jiguang Statue.jpg. Please take the trouble to go through your list of uploads, so we don't have to spend time notifying one by one. Stan 14:00, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maps of Fujian

Hi, on the maps of Fujian, you've marked out Kinmen (金門) but not Matsu (馬祖).

Also, I think the term "disputed" is too vague... what about "ROC control" or something similar? -- ran (talk) 17:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for your hard work on the Three Kingdoms Period. --Sarazyn • TALK • DE 08:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for help

Hi, I'm asking for help on some of the articles on the battles of the Three Kingdoms. I'm asking you because you seem like you know the difference between fact and fiction clearly. Because I don't really, *dry laugh*. (While some people treat the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, and god forbid, Dynasty Warriors as gospel!) Could you look over some of those articles, and leave a comment? (Those on Battle of Sishui Pass and Battle of Hulao Pass especially....I'm not sure if they even existed...) deadkid_dk 10:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

guan yu article

Also, the injury was sustained on the left arm instead of the right at an unspecified time. Hua Tuo was not alive at that time of treatment. He was credited to have died in 208 AD, 12 years before the scraping of the bones story happened.

Guan Yu died in 219 after being executed by sun quan so if this bone scrapping operation happend it happened 1 year after he died... either u got the date of hua tuo's death wrong or the bone scrapping date wrong.

Unspecified source for Image:Aesop Marble Figure.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aesop Marble Figure.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thuresson 12:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Quasimodo in Disney Animation.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Quasimodo in Disney Animation.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly Martin (talk) 12:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray for you!

Hey, thanks for devoting so much time and effort to putting cited historical information about Three Kingdoms figures up on wikipedia. It's great to see someone who watchdogs for people editing in fiction to biographies that should be historical! And you've done a LOT of biographies. Kudos! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CaTigeReptile (talk • contribs) 15:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

SoSZ

Hey, if you still love the Three Kingdoms but you're jaded of Wikipedia (Believe me, I'm jaded from touching the historical articles too, because no matter what you do. . .), you might have noticed that kongming.net is working on an officer encyclopaedia. . maybe you could be of use. I mean, I KNOW you could be of use. Just contact the webmaster, through the forum or otherwise.

"Three Kingdoms" historical articles

Hello there, Plastictv. I noticed you're not a fan of Dynasty Warriors information finding its way into the historical context of the Three Kingdoms figures. You may or may not have noticed, but I'm attempting to separate and clarify the difference between popular culture and historical context by adding all DW-related information into "Modern references" sections at the bottom of the page (which will also encompass all information regarding the 84-episode television serial). Whether or not you agree with said information appearing in these articles, we must concede that it will always find its way back into these articles now that the Romance of the Three Kingdoms drama has become so widely popular throughout modern culture, both East and West. At least this way, I'm hoping that additions made by younger, inexperienced and less... er... informed users will be confined to the bottom of the article, away from the information of historical significance. I've also added large, colourful portraits of the Koei-based characters to help these users easily identify these sections should they so wish to make edits to the articles. You'll still have to protect pages from fans of the novels, although Deadkid_dk appears to be making a concerted effort to categorise this information, too. I hope you'll support me in this and perhaps pick up on any errors and mistakes I might make along the way. Cheers, mate. Gamer Junkie 14:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear that. I know what it's like, actually, as I've become quite disillusioned, myself, with many of my fellow editors. One particular administrator and a handful of his supporters have torn into most of the contributions made to the Resident Evil articles. Many of us worked hard and referenced a lot of that information, only to have it removed (without so much as a discussion) and branded "non-encyclopedic." The editors in question are reducing articles to mere glorified memos because they personally find extensive, detailed articles to be taxing on the reader, as though they have any right whatsoever to decide how much is too much for an Internet user on the other side of the world. I just avoid those articles, now. They've been merged, re-written and shredded to footnotes. Worse yet, the editors doing this either don't care to or simply can't spell a two syllable word for love nor money. Now the articles are pathetic shadows by comparison, but at least they conform to guidelines. Whatever. In any case, thanks for your support regarding the Three Kingdoms historical figures. Gamer Junkie 06:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hua Xiong TV Serial.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hua Xiong TV Serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

greetings from Sweden

hej,Plastictv!

I found u r the creator of the page of Ningde City. Are you from there? Cuz i am. it's so rare that a Ningde countryman appears here. Or you just created a lot of pages for Chinese cities?

Have a nice day! Yi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Clonee (talk • contribs) 21:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

DYK nom on Cell Phone (film)

Hello,

Thanks for creating article on Cell Phone (film). Just for your information, I have nominated a DYK on this article, by having the following hook.

...that the award-winning Chinese film Cell Phone, with its box office profit of over ¥50 million, was the best-selling domestic film in the year 2003?

Thanks, - KNM ^Talk 07:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have an English reference for the above sentence, please add the same into the article. Also, if possible, in the article please provide a suitable replacements for the words "best-selling" and "domestic film".

Thank you! - KNM ^Talk 07:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again,

There is a comment in DYK talk page about the nomination made on this article.

“

Domestic is a term that's barely used outside the US. I would say "was the highest-grossing film in China in 2003." That said, the source only states it was a record for Feng Xiaogang's movies. It said nothing about being a national record

”

Can you please provide a reference to support the statement on best-selling domestic film of the year 2003? Thanks. - KNM ^Talk 13:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 15 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cell Phone (film), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 06:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Japanfilm.png

Thank you for uploading a new version of the Japanfilm icon. I thought I had done proper PNG versions of them all, but missed one - a major one. Over on the Commons you might notice I reuploaded the image because the Rising Sun looked a little smooshed to me. By tweaking the clapperboard icon behind it, I am able to maintain the correct ratios of the flags. So I just wanted to let you know about that. I see you are very active at maintain film articles, and I value your work very much. Best regards! — WiseKwai 14:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page

Your edit of Devils on the Doorstep was good. However, please remember: if you want to rename a page, please move it and NEVER cut and paste. See Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page. This is very important because we need to keep the entire edit history and must respect the previous editors. You can edit Guizi lai le now. If you still want to rename it to Devils on the Doorstep, please place your request at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Thanks. --Neo-Jay 16:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But you can improve the quality and at the same time not ignore the rules especially when the rules are reasonable! It is very important for us to respect our previous editors and keep the entire edit history. If you respect other editors, other editors will also respect you. If I cut a page substantially edited by you and paste it to another page and then improve its quality, what do you think of it? I hope you can follow the rules in Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page in the future and never rename a page by cut and paste. I have reverted your reversion at Devils on the Doorstep and Guizi lai le. Thanks. --Neo-Jay 17:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because you have edited Devils on the Doorstep, now Guizi lai le cannot be moved there by ordinary editors. Therefore I just placed a request to move at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Please express whether you support the move at Talk:Guizi lai le. After moving, you can edit Devils on the Doorstep. Thank you for your patience. --Neo-Jay 18:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. --Neo-Jay 20:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beijing Bicycle

Hi, thanks for your message, no I'm not working on adding to the plot. I'm more interested in the social and economic issues examined in the film, so if I can find the relevant sources, that's what I'll be adding the article. But of course go ahead if you want to add anything. LDHan 23:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?

On 12 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Put Down Your Whip, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 13:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Devils on the Doorstep

Hi, Guizi lai le has been moved to Devils on the Doorstep. Please feel free to edit it. It's strange that your edit history on Devils on the Doorstep disappears. I have asked User:Bubba hotep (his talk page), the adiministrator who enforced the move, whether it is possible to restore your contributions. Thank you. --Neo-Jay 13:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm looking into it. It shouldn't have done that. Is the article actually ok, apart from the edit history? It may be some sort of server cache delay. Bubba hotep 13:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes. If you look at it now, it should be ok. There seems to be a proliferance of Plastictv edits now. Must have been a cache lag. Bubba hotep 13:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per Your Questions

Hi. I substituted "passed away" with "died", because "passed away" is simply a euphemism. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and is written in a formal tone. There is no need to use such terms when a simpler more straightforward one will do. Goodnightmush^Talk 23:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied

Hello. I replied here. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 12:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 4 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Quitting, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 01:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article could use some work

Hello, Plastictv. The article regarding Wei Yan could use a real facelift. I know you handle this stuff, so I was wondering if you'd wanna have a shot at repairing the thing. Be warned, it's a real mess. Cheers. Gamer Junkie 06:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We'd like you onboard for this...

Hello, Plastictv. I'm not certain how active you are on Wikipedia anymore, but I know how you feel about fictional information from ROTK and DW infesting the historical accounts of the individuals involved, so I thought you'd want to hear this. Basically Ling.Nut and I have decided to draw up an article foundation for the individuals in question. This would go something along the lines of historical content followed by ROTK content followed by modern references. The last will hopefully draw the attention of most of the DW and pop culture editors, leaving the historical context safely intact. This would also serve to uniform the articles, making them more accessible and commonly written. It's a big task and I'm not sure it'll be to your tastes, but I thought you'd want a heads up anyway. You can find everything you need to know here. Our working page, from which we intend to coordinate and explain our goals for this wikiproject, is here. Cheers. Gamer Junkie 00:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PlasticTV, I dunno whether we need a separate wikiproject or a task force withing wikiproject Chinese history (or.. history of China.. or whatever it is...). Ling.Nut 04:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

project proposal

If interested in WikiProject Three Kingdoms, please add your name to the project proposal to show support. It may encourage others to join. Ling.Nut 19:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Minfong Ho.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Minfong Ho.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Minfong Ho.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Minfong Ho.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Swordsman (film) move...

I understand that Hong Kong films have official English titles on their initial release; I understand that The Swordsman is not that film's official title; but Wikipedia naming convention says that we should use "the title most recogniseable to English people". In the UK, the Republic of Ireland and apparently the Netherlands, the film has been marketed by Hong Kong Legends as "The Swordsman". Hence, this is the title by which I know it, as well as its primary title in a market of some millions of Anglophones. The argument is similar in nature to an argument about changes from UK to US spelling - because the article doesn't concern any English-speaking country in particular, and because the original author wrote using a particular version, it should be kept that way.

Also, your name doesn't fit with the DVD cover in the picture.

elvenscout742 22:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - in case you couldn't find any, here's verification: [6]. elvenscout742 22:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the WikiProject Three Kingdoms

Just a friendly reminder, the WikiProject Three Kingdoms is (almost) up and running! We (or I, at least) sincerely hope that you can be a part of the WikiProject! In your own words, "It might be good to have regular discussions among active and responsible contributors, for both technical and moral supports. Cheers!" _dk 10:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you would enjoy working on Battle of Red Cliffs instead? It's our current feature article drive :) _dk 01:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

啊，宁德人啊

早知道就不用说半天英语..刚才逛了一下关羽那页，关于汉寿-亭侯还是汉-寿亭侯那个，我觉得现在讨论得还是比较多的。see u around:) Ybfelix 19:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

不是那位ip，事实上，大陆是近来才能正常访问wiki的。u know,the GFW Ybfelix 07:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please see

Please see this Ling.Nut 14:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kong Rong TV Serial.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kong Rong TV Serial.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ding Yuan TV Serial.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ding Yuan TV Serial.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Cao Cao

I noticed that a couple years ago you added an image [7] of Cao Cao to the article on the same subject. Did you upload the original image? If so, could you provide a source for the image? Much thanks, ++Arx Fortis 06:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DunmanHighSchoolCrest.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DunmanHighSchoolCrest.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zedla 03:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Zhang He TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Zhang He TV Serial.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wizardman 20:48, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Jiang Wen

Template:Jiang Wen has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Qu Yuan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Qu Yuan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sun Jian TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sun Jian TV Serial.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Cao_Chong_Weighs_Elephant_Sculpture.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cao_Chong_Weighs_Elephant_Sculpture.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 03:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, red cliff movie

Hi there, sorry for my slow reply, but in the Red Cliff movie article about a year ago, you mentioned that Watanabe was not picked for the role of Tsao Tsao because he was Japanese. I'd like to read the article, but the current source link to that quote is dysfunctional. Do you know of any websites that have similar information? thanks Intranetusa (talk) 01:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Yan Liang Mask.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Yan Liang Mask.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Xu Chu Opera.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Xu Chu Opera.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 04:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Wen Chou Opera.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wen Chou Opera.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 23:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cao Xing TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cao Xing TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cao Cao TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cao Cao TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cell Phone movie poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cell Phone movie poster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:38, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Chen Gong TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chen Gong TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Dian Wei TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dian Wei TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Guan Yu TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Guan Yu TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:11, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Dong Zhuo Before Death TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dong Zhuo Before Death TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:20, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Dong Zhuo and Diao Chan TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dong Zhuo and Diao Chan TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:21, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Lü Bu and Diao Chan TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lü Bu and Diao Chan TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Lü Bu TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lü Bu TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Lü Bu Captured TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lü Bu Captured TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sun Ce TV Serial.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sun Ce TV Serial.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Zhuge Liang.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zhuge Liang.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. _dk (talk) 01:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sing to the Dawn Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sing to the Dawn Cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Yuan Tan TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yuan Tan TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:31, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Xu Chu TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Xu Chu TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Zhang Xiu TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Zhang Xiu TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Three Heroes Fight Lü Bu TV Serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Three Heroes Fight Lü Bu TV Serial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Guang Bing.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Guang Bing.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Xu Huang Portrait.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Xu Huang Portrait.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:27, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Guan Ping Statue.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Guan Ping Statue.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:15, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Guan Ping Statue.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Guan Ping Statue.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:12, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cell Phone movie poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cell Phone movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cell Phone movie poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cell Phone movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cell Phone movie poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cell Phone movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cell Phone movie poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cell Phone movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shower DVD cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shower DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:China-Fujian-Ningde.png

The file File:China-Fujian-Ningde.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Xiahou Dun Opera Facial Makeup.jpg

The file File:Xiahou Dun Opera Facial Makeup.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]