This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Waiting for Godot article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Waiting for Godot is the archetypical example of nonsense displacing sense in the 20th century. It forms a neat triangle, with nonsense painting (Picasso) and nonsense books (Finnegan's Wake) at the other corners. In the manner of a prosecuting attorney, I put it to the artistic community that the above items are no better than those random patterns within which the human mind often finds (due to ancient evolutionary pressures) some sort of illusory image or meaning. Having done so, there is then a battle, between differing interpretations, in which the only rule is never to suggest that everyone has been 'taken for a ride'. The item may then 'go viral' in the modern parlance and, particularly in the case of paintings, soon acquires a sky-rocketing monetary value which forever cements it firmly in place. I note that this cultural racket has already been neatly outed by H.C.Andersen (Emperor's New Clothes) and S.L.Clemens (The Royal Nonesuch), but is it not about time for a more robust attack to be made on this blatant artistic scam? A successful assault might even go viral. 78.145.10.148 (talk) 15:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
