Jump to content

Talk:Korean shamanism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

comments

[edit]

Korean Shamanism has about a million adherents in China.

Is this meant to indicate that all one million ethnic-Korean Chinese people are shamanism followers? Is there a source? -Baixue

Shamans consider themselves Buddhists

[edit]

It seems like it might be kind of hard to say how many people hold shamanism as their religion, since, when asked, most people who practice it self-identify as Buddhist. In fact, of course, the two co-exist--shamanic gods (some of whom are Buddhist or Taoist) for day-to-day, Buddhas for more ultimate concerns like salvation after death.

Maybe people with a Western view of religion (as in, you're either Christian or Jewish or Muslim or atheist or neopagan, but not any two at once) aren't the best people to collect data on Asian religion. Look at the hash that idea has made of the statistics on Shinto. Under normal circumstances, nobody but the most devout self-identify as any one thing, except for Christians. 71.223.169.27 01:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good point. However, I would note that the Choson Dynasty did try to impose one religion (Confucianism) on Korea to the exclusion of both Shamanism and Buddhism. We can really only report what reliable sources say about this topic. I believem, based on the note at the bottom of the article, that most of the current text comes from a public source document from the Libary of Congress Country Studies series. I'm in the process of trying to rewrite this on the basis of a monograph written by a professor at Kyung Hee University. JChap2007 02:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Small issues with writing; otherwise, immensely better

[edit]

In general, I cannot praise the improvements to this article enough. Some actual depth in an article about Korea is a breath of fresh air; too many of the Korea articles just seem to be content with a big table or list, and precious little explanation. See, for example, the article on Korean honorifics. The shamanism article used to be little more than that, just a list of some gut without a scrap of detail about what, specifically, a shaman does.

That said, hanja for as many terms as hanja exist for would be quite helpful (apparently gut doesn't have one). They're useful in showing a) the syllable breaks in words, and b) the precise meanings of words. For instance, until I saw it written in Hanja, I just assumed the psychopomps god, Saja, meant "Death something," possibly Death Child (死子); imagine my surprise to discover it means something along the lines of "agent, messenger" (使者).

Also, isn't it the Wikipedia policy to use Revised Romanization? Don't sweat that too much, though. Nagakura shin8 20:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words. I don't know much hanja and cannot type it (nor can I type hangul for that matter), so in the best tradition of {{sofixit}}, feel free to add hanja characters where appropriate. However, as shamanism is a native/Siberian-derived rather than being borrowed by the Koreans from China, it wouldn't surprise me if none of the words that are used to discuss it were Sino-Korean. If the words aren't Sino-Korean, they will not have associated hanja characters. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 03:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I mean the compliments; it's much improved. Actually, though, a surprising number of Shamanic terms have hanja, at least for parts of the words. "Mudang" for instance is 巫堂.
I have no problem with going through and adding hanja for words I know the hanja for (the above, for instance), but I'd really like hanja for the types of shaman, as those are terms I'd never encountered before. Possibly someone more acquainted with the hanja for this specialized area can help? Nagakura shin8 18:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A quick search on http://alldic.empas.com reveals the following: 강신무 (Kangshinmu) = 降神巫 (Shamans characterised by the possession of a spirit/god - i.e. a charismatic shaman); and Sessŭmu = 世襲巫 (hereditary shamans). Please feel free to add this to the article if you so wish! I don't want to just unilaterally make changes. Although...if no one says anything in a week, I'll just go ahead and make the changes.. Dark_chancellor 10:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Issue with this passage in the "Origins" section

[edit]

" Shamanism has its roots in ancient, land-based cultures, dating at least as far back as 40,000 years. ..... During a trance, the shaman’s soul left his body and travelled to other realms, where helping spirits guided him in his work."

From my research (I'll provide the source later when I get a chance to find it) there is no form astral travel in Korean Shamanism but rather the opposit where the shaman allows the dieties from other realms to enter her body for spiritual guidance and insight.

-Bill July 27, 2007

Refimprove tag

[edit]

I've added a refimprove tag to this page because the entire page is sourced by one book: Korean Shamanism—Muism. Other references would be more than helpful. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 04:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I had the time, I'd add my contributions from other sources; but in the meantime, if anyone DOES have the time, I would suggest using Don Baker's Religions of Korea in Practice, Korean Spirituality, and Laurel Kendall's The Life and Hard Times of a Korean Shaman. Being not well-read in this field, I don't know what other books are out there; but given that Baker is a respected historian, and Kendall is a respected anthropologist, I believe that an article that includes their works is at least better than an article based entirely on one source. — Dark_chancellor 10:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

The part about the word 'shaman'

[edit]

WHAT does that have to do with Korean culture? The Korean word for shamans is 무당 (Mudang). I don't think those two words are related to each other. If anyone has to say anything about the removal, say it. --119.149.173.53 (talk) 09:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're looking too much into what the English word might mean. Academia refers to a lot of people from folk religions who communicate with (or are possessed by for the purposes of communication with) deities as shamans. This is not to say that Siberian shamans are the same as Mongolian shamans, and thus are the same as Korean shamans. That's like saying Sri Lankan Buddhists are the same as Tibetan Buddhist, and thus are the same as Japanese Buddhists. Think of "shamans" as being an umbrella term that encompasses a large group of people who share the trait of "being an elite group whereby its members have the special ability to communicate with supernatural beings." I hope that helps. — Dark_chancellor 12:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I meant that the origin of the word 'shaman' has nothing to do with actual Korean Shamanism.--Younghyun1 (talk) 12:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I think I'll have to ask you to expand on that a little more; I'm having a little trouble understanding what you mean. Sorry about that. — Dark_chancellor 11:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark chancellor (talk • contribs)

I didn't explain clearly. I'll explain again. Here's the removed part from the original article.

The word "shaman" derives from Siberia and Central Asia, from the Tungusic saman. The term has been applied widely to refer to those experiences best described in Mircea Eliade’s classic work, Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. Eliade calls shamanism a “technique of ecstasy”, not to be confused with other forms of magic, sorcery or even experiences of religious ecstasy.

Sure, Korean mudangs can be called shamans, but my point is, what does the origin of the word 'shaman' have to do with Korean Shamanism?--119.149.173.53 (talk) 06:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you there?--Younghyun1 (talk) 09:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article image

[edit]

The image shows what a typical Korean shamanistic ritual would look like, including the bit with cross-gender aesthetics, but shouldn't it show a female shaman as opposed to a more rarely seen male shamans? The fact that mudangs are predominantly female seems a distinctive enough characteristic that I think the article image should reflect it... Though this isn't to say that baksu mudangs are in any way inferior or unqualified. Just not as prototypical. --70.94.212.86 (talk) 07:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Male Mudang

[edit]

A Male Mudang is a Pansu, not a Mudang. It's like saying a Male Waitress--uhh... that's a waiter. Fixing it. I hope someone does sweeps in the actual article as well as the caption.--Hitsuji Kinno (talk) 15:51, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The male mudang is Baksu... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.189.246.84 (talk) 18:42, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Initiation causes illness or cures it? One or the other it cannot be both.

[edit]

Clarify this, it is the kangshinmu who undergo the self-loss which causes a manic psychotic episode otherwise similar to a kundalini awakening psychosis. Hyun-key Kim Hogarth in her book Kut: Happiness Through Recriprocity makes the case clear that beyond being a psychotic episode, that the self-loss is a sacrifice of 'ki', of vitae or lifeforce energy. Similar in principle to acupuncture. P.S., Dr. Wilhelm Reich was a western scientist who studied orgone, a LifeForce he theorized to be held within muscular tension. the British Spiritualists as well were interested in eastern religion and yoga. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is very clear in his History of Spiritualism book that it is a sacrifice of 'ki' or 'prana' that causes mania in the medium and starts the initiation.

The research done into spiritism has been very clear on this for over 100yrs so please clarify — Preceding unsigned comment added by Troll ov Grimness (talk • contribs) 19:50, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Central Asia

[edit]

Why should this article and related ones have a WikiProject Central Asia template? Korea is not even close to Central Asia.--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Korean shamanism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Korean shamanism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Korean shamanism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

신교 means both "Shinism" (i.e. shamanism) and "Protestantism"

[edit]

신교 (S(h)ingyo or S(h)inkyo) means both "Shinism" ("religion of the spirits", cf. Korean Culture 1998 p. 33 / Korean Journal 1985 p. 22) and "Protestantism" in Korean, although in the case of Protestantism it is a shortening of Gaesingyo (개신교), which means "renewed spiritual teaching (within Christianity)". This overlap is interesting, and may explain the large % of South Koreans identifying as believers of "Protestantism" in censuses.--Aethelwolf Emsworth (talk) 13:48, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you created the terminology section, because I think the article really needed it. However, I have not found any sources in Korean using 신교 to mean shamanism. (I only looked at modern dictionaries and encyclopedias though, so it's possible it's out there in scholarly works or older texts.) 무속 and 무교 are the terms I've come across most frequently in Korean sources, which is why I put them at the top of the article. Again, it's possible they're not the most common terms in English-language scholarship. Just wanted to explain my edits in more detail. Best, Lenoresm (talk) 16:41, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Lenoresm. "S(h)inkyo/-gyo//-ism" and "Sindo" are frequently mentioned in thorough English-language academic scholarship about the topic, attesting a long tradition of this name in spoken Korean. As the sources say, it means an indigenous "belief in spirits", i.e. Korean folk religion, which contains shamanism. Based on a quick Google search for 신교, it seems that it is used on a variety of websites to refer to the indigenous religion practised at shrines (similar to Japanese Shinto, though far less important in Korea due to historical circumstances and hindrances). "Korean shamanism", which we use as the title of the article, is surely the most used in generalist sources because the leaders of this "religion of the spirits" are the shamans. 무속/무교, which are "shamanic practice" and "Muism", are indeed frequently used for the same reason.--Aethelwolf Emsworth (talk) 21:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To create: redirect from Shinism

[edit]

To create: a redirect to this article from Shinism. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 19:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Black magic?

[edit]

Korean black magic should be mentioned in the article as well. Black Magic (마법- Mabob)

Also alternative terms: “muism and shaman mudang” (무당巫堂).


~~ Ted ~~ 2607:FEA8:4A2:4100:918D:B2E1:3F13:E888 (talk) 07:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Korean Characters needed

[edit]

Korean characters are needed eg like in the "Talismans and divination" section for "pujuk (bujeok)".

... An important component of the mudang's role is to produce talismans called pujǒk (bujeok)

Without the Korean characters English terms used in the article is no good. Its needed through out article not just in some areas. For translation accuracy.

~~ Ed ~~ 2607:FEA8:4A2:4100:918D:B2E1:3F13:E888 (talk) 07:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Also romanizations used need to be standardized. I standardized a few (now uses "kut" consistently), but there are a few stragglers. I think the article should mostly use McCune Reischauer, with the exceptions being if any existing article uses Revised Romanization. toobigtokale (talk) 06:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Korean_shamanism&oldid=1229327955"